Any person who is thought to have disappeared deliberately. Find Out More

By Terrain

Male Female Other Total
Crag / Broken Ground 47 13 1 61
Farmland 267 127 3 397
Moorland / Upland 126 39 5 171
Not Specified 49 22 3 74
Plantation (dense) 87 25 2 114
Urban 230 132 15 378
Water Margin 110 36 4 151
Woodland / Parkland 227 67 2 296
Total: 1143 461 35 1642

The four characteristics shown in table 16 come from an analysis of the text fields of reports submitted via the data collection system. These were the characteristics of the missing person that were most frequently mentioned. They are not mutually exclusive, so for example a missing person could have been reported as having threatened to commit suicide as well as having a history of previous threats.

All this is dependent entirely on what the individual doing the reporting felt was worth mentioning. This should be borne in mind when considering the conclusions that we have drawn about the behaviour of missing despondents with these characteristics. It is worth noting, however, that 69% of the reports submitted for missing despondents included a reference to at least one of them, which leads us to suspect that where a characteristic was present then it was highly likely to have been reported.

By Outcome

n %
None 583 35.5%
Unknown 443 27.0%
Fatality 408 24.8%
Serious Injury 104 6.3%
Minor Injury 104 6.3%

Despondents were significantly different from all the other categories in the study. Overall, significantly fewer despondents were found unhurt, and significantly more were either found injured or not found at all. The percentages varied with the terrain and, in the case of farmland, by gender. The results for plantations and woodland were similar, and were combined for ease of reporting

By Location Found

All Terrains

n
Habitation 333
Habitation 333
Not Found 413
Not Found 413
Open Ground 125
Open Ground 125
Water 175
Water 175

Significant differences were found between the different types of terrain, and there was a gender difference in farmland. As before, incidents in plantations and woodland have been combined.

The following additional information was provided with regard to four incidents for which the location was reported as ‘open ground’: at a high vantage point overlooking the valley, close to a footpath, in a quarry, in the hospital grounds.

Significant locations

In many of the reports submitted to the system (15% of female despondents and 14% of male despondents) there are references to the missing person being found in a location that is significant to them in some way, either because it is a local beauty spot or viewpoint, or they have memories associated with the place (‘… went there regularly with the family …’) or they often visited it (‘… on the route that he used to take the dog for a walk …’).

Significant locations are linked in particular to male fatalities. There is no significant difference between the likelihood of a fatality when the indication is that a missing female despondent is in a location of this sort compared with any other location.

If there are strong indicators to suggest that a missing male has headed for such a location then it is highly likely that they will be found dead; 62% of missing male
despondents found in these places are found dead, compared with 29% who are found in other locations. These are significantly different. If the missing male despondent has not threatened suicide then the fatality rate increases to 70% if they are found in a location of this kind. Again, this is a statistically significant result.

Distance: 0.05 Km / Percentage: 42%

Distance: 0.1 Km / Percentage: 42%

Distance From IPP (Km)

osmap
10% 0 Km
20% 0 Km
30% 0 Km
40% 0 Km
50% 0.4 Km
60% 0.8 Km
70% 1 Km
80% 2 Km
90% 6 Km
100% 300 Km

The distances travelled by despondents were significantly different to the distances travelled by all the other categories in that a greater proportion of depondents was found nearer to the IPP (36% of despondents were found within 0.5 km of the IPP compared to 25% of the other categories); terrain and gender made no significant difference to the distances despondents travelled.